
Why do people even search for this code and what should I know first?
When I type tpe: 2357 into a quote tool, I am looking up ASUSTeK Computer Inc. on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE). That single string is a shortcut many platforms use to show the live quote, charts, news, and filings for ASUS, the company behind ROG, TUF Gaming, Vivobook, Zenbook, ProArt, ExpertBook, motherboards, graphics cards, monitors, routers, and servers. In simple words, it is the stock code that points me to one of the world’s best‑known PC brands.
In this guide I keep the code mention low and focus on context. I will walk through what the business actually sells, where revenue comes from, how I read the numbers, and the practical steps I take before I add anything to a portfolio. My goal is to make complex terms easy without dumbing them down.
What is the company behind the code?
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is a Taipei headquartered hardware maker with global sales across North America, Europe, Asia‑Pacific, and the Middle East. The brand ASUS spans consumer PCs, gaming systems under Republic of Gamers (ROG), productivity laptops like Zenbook and Vivobook, creator gear under ProArt, commercial notebooks ExpertBook, and components such as motherboards, GPUs, AIO coolers, PSUs, cases, Wi‑Fi 7 routers, modems, NAS, and monitors. The group also operates ASUS Business for enterprise clients and works with partners including Microsoft, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm for platforms like Windows 11, Copilot+ PC, Ryzen, Core Ultra, and Snapdragon X Elite.
What benefits do I get by understanding the code properly?

When I know the code maps to a real company with distinct brands and product cycles, I can:
- Connect headlines about AI PCs, Windows on Arm, or GPU shortages to possible revenue and margin effects.
- Read quarterly results and know whether growth is coming from gaming notebooks, commercial PCs, or components.
- Compare valuation to peers such as Acer, MSI (Micro‑Star International), Lenovo, HP, and Dell.
- Track shipments using Gartner or IDC data and tie that back to earnings season.
How do I frame the business model in plain language?
I think of ASUS as running across three big lanes:
- Systems: notebooks, desktops, gaming rigs, mini PCs, workstations, Chromebooks.
- Components and peripherals: motherboards, GPUs, memory kits, SSDs, PSUs, cases, keyboards, mice, headsets, webcams.
- Commercial and creator solutions: ExpertBook, ProArt, servers, edge devices, pro monitors, industry solutions.
The company generates cash by moving volume during big cycles, keeping premium ASPs in ROG and ProArt, and managing inventory across channels like Best Buy, Amazon, JD.com, Tmall, Shopee, and regional distributors. Currency is TWD in filings, yet a lot of costs and sales sit in USD and EUR, so FX matters.
Where do the headline numbers sit right now?
I keep a simple snapshot that I can refresh each quarter. This is the type of table I maintain in my notes so I do not get lost in spreadsheets.
ASUS quick snapshot at a glance
| Metric | Latest view I track | Why I care |
| Revenue trailing twelve months (TWD) | Around mid‑650s billions based on recent consolidated reports | Tells me scale and post‑downcycle recovery |
| Full year revenue last fiscal (TWD) | About 587 billion | Confirms rebound versus prior year |
| Net income last fiscal (TWD) | Low 30s billions | Confirms earnings recovery and operating discipline |
| Gross margin trailing twelve months | About 16 percent | Shows mix of premium gaming and creator lines |
| EPS trailing twelve months (TWD) | High 40s range | Useful for P/E and payout checks |
| Net cash vs. debt | Light leverage, healthy liquidity | Supports inventory swings and buybacks or dividends |
| Core brands | ROG, TUF, Zenbook, Vivobook, ProArt, ExpertBook | Premium mix protectors |
| Product growth vectors | AI PC, Windows on Arm, creator monitors, Wi‑Fi 7, servers at the edge | Where the next leg of growth can come from |
I always double‑check these with the investor relations site and a couple of neutral data platforms, then I paste fresh values in the same format after each quarter.
What questions do I ask before I ever think about a buy or a sell?
I use a short checklist. It keeps me grounded when headlines get loud.
- Is end demand improving across consumer, gaming, and commercial PCs according to IDC or Gartner shipments?
- Are premium mixes rising: more ROG Zephyrus, ROG Strix, ProArt StudioBook, and ExpertBook relative to entry models?
- Are component margins stable for motherboards and GPUs considering channel pricing and new GeForce RTX or Radeon launches?
- How is inventory positioned at major partners and distributors in the US, EU, Japan, and ASEAN markets?
- What is the cadence of AI PC launches across Intel Core Ultra, AMD Ryzen AI, and Snapdragon X Elite platforms?
- Is there operating leverage: do opex lines grow slower than gross profit as volumes rise?
- What is capital allocation: cash returns via dividends, occasional buybacks, capex on R&D, and channel investments?
How do I read the quarterly presentation without getting lost?
I start with five lines in the consolidated results and build the story from there:
- Top line: revenue trend versus last year and last quarter, with commentary on systems versus components.
- Gross profit: margin movement, mix shifts into gaming, creator, and commercial.
- Operating expenses: where R&D and marketing moved, especially around AI PC launches or major esports sponsorships under ROG.
- Operating income: whether scale beat fixed costs and whether currency helped or hurt.
- Net income and EPS: underlying earnings power after non‑operating items.
What does the product cycle mean in practice?
- Back‑to‑school and holiday quarters usually lift notebooks and gaming systems.
- Next‑gen GPU cycles influence component sell‑through and average prices.
- Enterprise refresh cycles lift ExpertBook, ProArt monitors, and services bundles.
- Windows releases and Copilot features push premium configurations with higher margins.
Which peers do I compare against and why does it matter?
I place ASUS next to Acer, MSI, Lenovo, HP, and Dell. The point is not to crown a winner. It is to see who holds pricing, who owns gaming mindshare, and who executes on new form factors like ultrathin AI notebooks, OLED creators, and quiet small form factor PCs.
Peer comparison cues I track
- Gaming brand equity: esports presence of ROG compared with Acer Predator and MSI Gaming.
- Creator push: depth of ProArt versus Apple MacBook Pro uptake in creator communities, plus Adobe workflow tuning.
- Commercial credibility: ExpertBook progress against HP EliteBook and Dell Latitude in tenders.
- Components leadership: motherboard share and GPU partner status with NVIDIA and AMD.
What macro and supply chain items do I not ignore?

- Currency: revenue booked in USD and EUR while reporting in TWD can move reported margins.
- Logistics: shipping lanes to US, EU, and MEA affect lead times and working capital.
- Silicon availability: NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, Qualcomm supply priority shapes premium model availability.
- Panel prices: OLED and high refresh IPS costs swing quarterly gross margin.
- Channel inventory: Amazon, Best Buy, MediaMarkt, JD, and Tmall weeks‑of‑stock data from sell‑through trackers.
How do I translate buzzwords like AI PC into practical drivers?
I strip the term down to line items I can count.
- On‑device NPU performance: higher TOPS can justify higher ASPs in Zenbook, ROG, and ExpertBook.
- Copilot features local to the device: can reduce cloud dependence and form a reason to refresh older laptops.
- Battery life and thermals: Snapdragon X Elite laptops promise long battery hours; whether users feel it in real tasks affects reviews and repeat sales.
- Creator workflows: ProArt systems paired with Studio drivers, Calman Ready monitors, and color‑accurate OLED panels let editors and designers justify premium spend.
What practical steps do I take to model earnings at a high level?
I use a plain worksheet with three blocks and avoid overfitting.
Block 1: Volume and mix
- Units for consumer notebooks, gaming notebooks, desktops, commercial PCs, and components.
- ASPs for each bucket, guided by price bands in retail listings and channel checks.
Block 2: Costs and margin
- Bill of materials for CPU, GPU, memory, storage, panel, chassis, power, and cooling.
- Freight and warehousing assumptions in US and EU.
- Warranty provisions in line with historical ratios.
Block 3: Operating expenses and other items
- R&D as a coherent share of sales during big launch windows.
- Marketing sync with esports events and creator campaigns.
- Currency and interest effects in line with recent quarters.
This gets me to a directional gross margin, operating margin, and net income view that I can flex with bull and bear assumptions.
What real life examples make these ideas less abstract?
- When NVIDIA unveils a new GeForce RTX series, I expect a wave of ROG Strix and TUF Gaming notebook refreshes. That tends to push average prices up and improve margins for a quarter or two if supply is tight.
- If Qualcomm rolls out a faster NPU on the X Elite platform and Microsoft spotlights new Copilot features, I look for Zenbook and ExpertBook models to lean into battery life claims. Reviews on YouTube, Reddit, and tech press then influence sell‑through.
- If panel makers raise OLED prices, I brace for a mild margin headwind unless price bands also shift in retail. Creator lines like ProArt can still hold value due to color accuracy.
How do I use valuation without pretending I can predict every quarter?
I keep a few basic ratios and a sanity check range.
- Price to earnings: I set a range based on rolling EPS and where peers trade.
- Enterprise value to sales: useful in hardware downcycles when earnings compress.
- Free cash flow yield: I favor names that convert earnings to cash when inventory clears.
- Dividend yield and policy: ASUS has a track record of returning cash; I check payout stability over several years.
A compact valuation checklist I actually use
- Current P/E against a 3 to 5 year band.
- EV/Sales compared with Acer, MSI, Lenovo, HP, Dell.
- FCF margin during both upcycle and downcycle years.
- Dividend coverage using forward earnings estimates.
What are the biggest risks I keep in front of me?
- PC cycle risk: if IDC and Gartner shipment data roll over, even premium mixes may not offset volume declines.
- Supply constraints: tight GPU or CPU supply can cap revenue in gaming seasons.
- Channel corrections: if distributors hold too much stock, discounts can pressure margins.
- Currency swings: a strong TWD can dent reported profits.
- Competition: price wars in entry segments hurt ASPs, while creator and commercial markets remain contested by Apple, HP, and Dell.
What signals tell me the story is improving rather than just noisy?
- Rising gross margin without an abnormal spike in expenses.
- Consistent premium mix in ROG, ProArt, and ExpertBook shipments.
- Inventory in days trending down through back‑to‑school into holiday season.
- Stable channel pricing on core models across major retailers.
- New platform launches landing with strong third‑party reviews and fewer return issues.
Can I build a simple scenario table to keep bias in check?
Yes. I keep one page that forces me to view both sides.
Directional scenario sketch I refresh each quarter
| Scenario | Demand assumption | Margin view | Working capital | Implied outcome |
| Bull | AI PC refresh lifts premium mixes in gaming, creator, and commercial | Margins improve on mix and scale | Inventory clears smoothly, receivables healthy | Revenue growth mid teens with EPS expansion |
| Base | Gradual recovery, stable component pricing, steady commercial bids | Margins steady with modest lift from premium brands | Inventory normalizes, cash conversion healthy | Low to mid single digit top line growth with EPS stability |
| Bear | Weak consumer demand and channel discounting | Margins compress on price cuts and panel costs | Inventory rises and drags cash flow | Flat to down revenue with EPS pressure |
How do I turn all of this into an actual research routine?
I keep it to a weekly rhythm so I do not chase noise.
My weekly rhythm
- Monday: scan investor relations for new releases or event decks.
- Mid‑week: price and volume review, peek at retail price bands for ROG and ProArt listings.
- Friday: note shipment updates from IDC or Gartner if published, update my quick snapshot table.
My quarterly rhythm
- Read the full earnings release and presentation the day it drops.
- Update revenue, margin, EPS, cash, and inventory lines in my sheet.
- Rebuild the mini scenario table using new commentary.
- Re‑check valuation bands versus peers.
What does the brand portfolio tell me about durability?
- ROG keeps a tight link to esports and enthusiast communities, which helps pricing during product cycles.
- ProArt focuses on creators who care about color accuracy, factory calibration, HDR, and ports that match Adobe and DaVinci Resolve workflows.
- ExpertBook caters to IT needs like vPro, MIL‑STD claims, battery serviceability, and remote manageability.
- TUF Gaming holds the midrange where volume lives.
- Components remain a calling card with motherboard leadership and longstanding ties to NVIDIA and AMD partners.
What headlines matter more than others?
I separate noise from signal using three buckets.
- Signal: quarterly revenue and margin, inventory commentary, product mix by segment, capex and payout updates, shipment data from IDC/Gartner.
- Likely noise: one‑off limited editions, minor firmware updates, small retailer promotions.
- Context: macro prints on PMI, consumer confidence, freight rates, and FX that influence near‑term results without changing the long view.
What could change my view quickly, for better or worse?
- A breakout AI PC cycle that lifts premium ASPs faster than costs.
- A sizable supply shock to high‑end GPUs or panels.
- A sharp FX move that flips reported margins.
- A mismatch between launch hype and real‑world battery life or thermals on new platforms.
Can I see a one‑page cheat sheet before I go any further?
Yes. This is the high‑level sheet I keep pinned.
One‑page cheat sheet
- Ticker: 2357 on Taiwan Stock Exchange, quote often displayed with .TW or TWSE suffix.
- Business: consumer PCs, gaming systems, creator gear, commercial PCs, components, networking, monitors, servers.
- Brands: ROG, TUF, Zenbook, Vivobook, ProArt, ExpertBook.
- Key partners: Microsoft, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, Qualcomm.
- Revenue base: hundreds of billions of TWD with strong international mix.
- Near‑term drivers: AI PC rollouts, Windows on Arm momentum, creator and commercial refresh.
- Risks: PC cycle, channel inventory, FX, component cost swings, intense competition.
How do I keep the writing honest and number‑aware without turning this into a spreadsheet?
I use real values when they matter, but I pair them with plain language. I care far more about the direction of margins and the durability of premium brands than a false sense of precision. When I update this, I refresh the snapshot and scenario tables and keep the rest of the narrative stable.
FAQ style clarifications
Is the code different across websites?
Yes. Some sites show 2357.TW, others show 2357:TT, others just show 2357 under TWSE. It is the same listing.
Does the company pay dividends?
Historically the group has returned cash. I still check the latest cash return plan on the investor relations page each year because payout levels can change with the cycle.
What about that AI PC noise, is it real?
It becomes real only if buyers pick premium configs in enough volume and channel pricing holds. I watch retailer listings and review sites to verify.
Why do components still matter if most headlines are about laptops?
Motherboards and GPUs keep the brand inside enthusiast builds. They also raise attachment for peripherals, monitors, and routers, which supports margins.
Conclusion
I keep a low mention of the code itself and focus on the company, the brands, the cycles, and the numbers that move the story. The snapshot table, the scenario sketch, and a short checklist are enough to keep me disciplined. If premium mixes in ROG, ProArt, and ExpertBook hold while channel inventory stays healthy, earnings power can keep improving. If demand softens or discounts spread, I expect pressure on margins and a slower cash conversion. Either way, the method here helps me react to data rather than headlines, which is the only way I have found to stay level‑headed when watching a hardware name on the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Source: https://megapersonals.co.com/






